Before I
start, I want to make it clear that I’m not an Islamic scholar. Therefore I
could have made mistakes while writing this article. I’ll be grateful to
anyone who would point them out. I’m
writing this as a concerned Muslim/Human Being/World Citizen. My intention is
not to antagonize anyone. I hope everyone reads this with an open mind.
The fall of
the Iron curtain and disintegration of USSR was celebrated worldwide. Communism
was defeated comprehensively as it proved to be a failed ideology. The
polarized world had ceased to exist. People were jubilant and envisioned a future of peace, progress and
prosperity. Globalization
and later The Internet made the world a smaller place. It’s even possible that
nationalities would be nonexistent in the next 150 years. The forward march
towards a sophisticated and highly rational civilization has begun. In reality,
unfortunately things are not that simple. Since all motions are relative
(depends on the point of view of the individual), there is a significant
minority which views it the other way/opposite direction. This decadent
minority would go at any length to establish their malicious agenda even if it
means large scale depopulation, brutal wars and absolute infringement of
individual rights. One such group belonging to the evil minority is The
Islamists. The reason why I choose to highlight this particular group should be
obvious to anyone who knows what is plaguing the world today. Iraq,
Afghanistan, Pakistan, Nigeria etc are terrorized daily by these lunatics and
the rest of the world is constantly under threat of violent attacks.
The Islamists
claim that they are the warriors of Islam and everything they do is for the
cause of Allah. They quote the Islamic scriptures to justify their barbaric
acts and call it Jihad or holy war. These terrorists brainwash the feeble-minded into becoming suicide bombers (from an Islamist perspective- A martyr) and
create havoc by killing innocents and disrupting normal life. Strangely, most
of the victims of Islamist terror are ordinary Muslims. It makes one wonder, Why
is the majority of Muslim society suffering today? Many frail minded folks
would blame the West for all their problems. But the fact remains that the
enemy is within. Only when Muslims realize this, we can hope to change for the
better.
I am going
to analyze some specifics/issues in Islam which I believe are a major hindrance
to the progress of Muslim society. I shall also offer solutions which are
reconcilable with the spirit of Islam and congruous to achieving the ultimate
goal of Global peace. Some of the
issues in discussion are faced by every human being, regardless of race,
religion and sex. These are social, economic and political problems at personal
and societal level. Other issues clearly exist as a result of
medieval/tribal/crude/irrational dogma/tradition. I shall expound on this after
highlighting all the issues. Here are some of the specifics I’ll focus on:
1) Women’s
rights, Polygamy and marriage
2) Apostasy and Blasphemy
3) Jihad and
martyrdom
4) Homosexuality and adultery
5) Slavery, concept of blood money and
Kafir/Kufr/Infidels
Women’s rights, Polygamy and marriage
"O ye who believe! it is not lawful for you
to inherit women against their will; nor should you detain them
wrongfully that you may take away part of that which you have given them,
except that they be guilty of a flagrant evil; and consort with them in
kindness; and if you dislike them, it may be that you dislike a thing wherein
Allah has placed much good." (The Holy Quran - Ch.4:V.20)
It’s
well known fact that pre Islamic Arabia was a living hell for women. Men could
have any number of wives and the concept of Woman being an equal member of the
society was unknown. Prophet Mohammed introduced many reforms which resulted in
tremendous upliftment of women. Prostitution was banned; women got a share in
property, the limit of wives for each man was brought down to four etc… It was
a monumental change for 6th century Arabia. But, now we are in the
21st century and as every civilization/race/religion in the world
has evolved, so must we.
In
the modern world, Women are considered equal to men whether it’s military,
Finance, Science or any field. Individuality is a human right and is crucial
for anyone to succeed and elevate his status in the current society.
Unfortunately this is not the case with a large section of Muslims especially
in countries where the Sharia Law is implemented. The world is aware of these draconian Laws. The Islamist Jurists
are the greatest spin masters the world has ever seen. For example:
"Men
are the protectors and maintainers of women, because Allah has given the one
more strength than the other, and because they support them from their means.
Therefore the righteous women are devoutly obedient and guard in the husband's
absence what Allah would have them to guard. As to those women on whose part
you fear disloyalty and ill-conduct, admonish them (first), (next), refuse to
share their beds, (and last) beat
them (lightly); but if they return to obedience, seek not against them
means (of annoyance); for Allah is most High and Great (above you all). If you
fear a breach between them twain, appoint (two) arbiters, one from his family
and the other from hers. If they wish for peace, Allah will cause their
reconciliation; for Allah has full knowledge and is acquainted with all
things." (The Holy Quran- An-Nisa': 34-35)
The
above verse is often used by Islamists to beat/torture women who are not
“obedient”. Actually the meaning is very different here. The Arabic word used
in Verse 4:34 above is "idribuhunna", which is derived from
"daraba" which means "beat". The issue with all of the Arabic words that
are derived from the word "daraba" is that they don't necessarily
mean "hit". The word
"idribuhunna" for instance, could very well mean to "leave"
them. It is exactly like telling someone
to "beat it" or "drop it" in English. The word
"daraba" is also used in the Quranic Verse 14:24 :
"Seest thou not how Allah sets (daraba)
forth a parable? -- A goodly Word Like a goodly tree, Whose root is firmly
fixed, And its branches (reach) To the heavens".
"daraba"
here meant "give an example".
If I say in Arabic "daraba laka mathal", it means "give
you an example". This is just one of the examples of how some scholars of Islam manipulate the meaning of Quranic verses.
However
, the problem is much more deep rooted. Several hadiths order Muslim men to
beat women for almost any reason. For example:
Sahih
Bukhari (72:715) – “A woman came to Muhammad and begged her to stop her husband
from beating her. Her skin was bruised
so badly that she it is described as being "greener" than the green
veil she was wearing. Muhammad did not
admonish her husband, but instead ordered her to return to him and submit to
his sexual desires.”
Abu Dawud (2142) - "The Prophet (peace
be upon him) said: A man will not be asked as to why he beat his wife."
The Hadiths
quoted above a considered “authentic” by Islamic scholars. One may ask, what
does this indicate? It’s pretty
obvious that if the Islamist scholars cannot twist the meaning of the verses
from the Quran, they use the Hadith and other related sources (which I won’t
even bother exploring in my article). As far as the veracity of Hadiths is
concerned, I would suggest people to read “The Origins of Muhammadan Jurisprudence” - a widely influential
work of noted British-German orientalist Joseph Schacht on the medieval 'ilm
al-ḥadith, or the science of ḥadith literature. It clearly shows how flawed the
methodology of collecting the hadith was.
I know I
have just hit a raw nerve of most Muslims now by questioning the authenticity
of most hadiths. But ask yourself, as civilized and educated folks, can we
allow our daughters/sisters/mothers to be beaten by other men?
I ask you
to pay heed to the verse below and introspect:
“Among His
Signs is this, that he created for you mates from among yourselves, that they
may dwell in tranquility with them, and He has put love and mercy between your
(hearts): Verily in that are signs for those who reflect." [The Quran
30:21]
Another
controversial issue worth pondering on is Polygamy. Although only 2-3% of the
Muslim men follow this, the fact is that the Islamists believe that it’s OK to
have 4 wives. The orthodox Ulema justify polygamy on the most
frivolous/malicious grounds. They argue that men's sexual needs are greater
than those of women; secondly, they argue that women go through periods or give
birth to children and it is not possible to have sexual intercourse with them
during these periods and hence man needs more than one wife. They also argue
that if a woman is terminally ill it is better to marry another woman rather
than divorce her and make her psychological wreck. Also, if she is barren and
cannot give birth to another child, it is better to take second wife without
divorcing her and add to her woes. She already suffers from lack of children.
“If you
fear you will not deal justly by the orphans, marry of the women, who seem good
to you, two or three or four; and if you fear that you cannot do justice (to so
many) then one (only) or the captives that your right hands possess.
Thus it is more likely that you will not do injustice” (The Quran 4:2-3).
I shall
explain about the “captives” in the Slavery section, but basically this is the
verse which the Islamists justify for having four wives. These “polygamy
verses” were revealed shortly after the battle of Uhud, which was a devastating
loss to the early Muslim community with many men dying on the battlefield. The gender imbalance, and the fact that at the time and place women largely depended on men for their economic survival,
made polygamy a pragmatic solution for a woman seeking protection for herself
and protection for her children who no longer had a father but often had
valuable property to their name that could be stolen or mismanaged by male
guardians. So it is clear that the Quran permits polygamy for the purpose of
caring for orphaned children and defending their assets The world has changed a
lot since 6th century Arabia, this was good then, but is
unacceptable today and rightly so!
There are
several other aspects like alimony, share in property, dress code etc… which
needs to be reformed and a liberal/humanistic outcome is preferable.
Apostasy and Blasphemy
There is no
compulsion in religion. The right direction is here forth distinct from
error..." [The Quran 2:256]
"And
so, O Prophet, exhort them, thy task is ONLY to exhort; thou canst NOT compel
them to believe." [The Quran 88:21-22]
"Call
thou (all mankind) unto thy Sustainer's path with wisdom and goodly
exhortation, and argue with them in MOST KINDLY MANNER..." [16:125]
From the
above verses, one may think that apostates/ex Muslims have the option of
discarding/criticizing Islam whenever they feel like. These are principles
adopted in a civilized, democratic and secular society. Unfortunately, there
are several other sources which advocate the opposite to all of this. For
example:
“How shall
God guide those who reject Faith after they accepted it and bore witness that
the apostle was true and that clear signs had come unto them? But God guides
not a people unjust. Of such the reward is that on them (rests) the curse of God,
of His Angels, and of all mankind;--In that will they dwell; nor will their
penalty be lightened, nor respite be their lot;--except for those that repent
(even) after that, make amends; For verily God is oft-forgiving, most
merciful." [The Quran 3:86-89]
Islamists
use the phrase, "curse of Allah," as a license to murder anyone
considered to be an apostate. Plus there are several Hadith which call for
murder of apostates
Narrated
Ikrima: Ali burnt some people and this news reached Ibn 'Abbas, who said,
"Had I been in his place I would not have burnt them, as the Prophet said,
'Don't punish (anybody) with Allah's Punishment.' No doubt, I would have killed
them, for the Prophet said, 'If somebody (a Muslim) discards his religion, kill
him.' "
Sahih
Bukhari 4:52:260
'Abdullah
(b. Mas'ud) reported Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) as saying: It is
not permissible to take the life of a Muslim who bears testimony (to the fact
that there is no god but Allah, and I am the Messenger of Allah), but in one of
the three cases: the married adulterer, a life for life, and the deserter of
his Din (Islam), abandoning the community.
Sahih
Muslim 16:4152
Based on
these verses and sayings, some Muslim majority nations enforce apostasy laws
with severe penalties (including death).
There simply cannot be a debate on this. This barbaric law has to go.
Another
aspect on similar lines which includes non Muslims too is Blasphemy. Here for
criticizing the Quran or Prophet Mohammed, the penalty is severe (in many cases
is death). This is another draconian law which has no place in a civilized
society whose foundation is based on freedom of speech. A well known case on
this was the Salman Taseer murder. Taseer was a secular statesman who was
against the Pakistani Blasphemy Law. As expected, the terrorists later killed
him for it, claiming that he was the enemy of Islam. What’s most surprising is
how explicitly some verses in The Quran talk against the concept of Blasphemy
and despite this, the Islamists fight for this inhuman law.
"And
when they hear vain talk, they turn away therefrom and say: "to us our
deeds and to you yours; peace be to you." [The Quran 28: 55]
"And
the servants of Allah . . . are those who walked on the earth in humility, and
when the ignorant address them, they say 'Peace'" [The Quran 25:63]
"Allah
is with those who restrain themselves." [The Quran 16: 128]
"The
recompense for an injury is an injury equal thereto: but if a person forgets
and makes reconciliation, his reward is due from Allah." [The Quran 62:40]
Jihad and Martyrdom
There are
two commonly accepted meanings of jihad: an inner spiritual struggle and an
outer physical struggle. The "greater jihad" is the inner struggle by
a believer to fulfill his religious duties. Muslim jurists explained there are
four kinds of jihad fi sabilillah (struggle in the cause of God):
• Jihad of the heart (jihad bil qalb/nafs)
is concerned with combating the devil and in the attempt to escape his
persuasion to evil. This type of Jihad was regarded as the greater jihad
(al-jihad al-akbar).
• Jihad by the tongue (jihad bil lisan) is concerned
with speaking the truth and spreading the word of Islam with one's tongue.
• Jihad by the hand (jihad bil yad) refers
to choosing to do what is right and to combat injustice and what is wrong with
action.
• Jihad by the sword (jihad bis saif) refers
to qital fi sabilillah (armed fighting in the way of God, or holy war), the
most common usage by Salafi Muslims and Islamists.
Some contemporary Islamists have succeeded in
replacing the greater jihad, the fight against desires, with the lesser jihad,
the holy war to establish, defend and extend the Islamic state. Media has
coined a term for these extremists - “Jihadis”, which is appropriate given the
current scenario of Jihadi terrorism. Jihadis are the biggest security threat
to the world. From Saudi Arabia to Chechnya, they have set up camps in most
nations. Their brutalities and their operating mechanisms (suicide bombings,
IEDs etc) are well known. It should be obvious to everyone what their next
target is: acquiring Nuclear weapons. One may wonder what the scriptures say
about this menace of violent Jihad. After all, they are motivated by the verses
of the Quran, right?
One view:
According
to the Qur’an, killing any person without a just cause is as big a sin as
killing the whole humanity and saving the life of one person is as good deed as
saving the whole humanity. (The Quran: Al-Ma’idah: 32)
Take not
life, which Allah hath made sacred, except by way of justice and law: thus does
He command you, that ye may learn wisdom.” (The Quran- Al-An`am: 151)
The Quran
even demands the safety of non-believer.
"And
if anyone of the idolaters seeketh thy protection (O Muhammad), then protect
him so that he may hear the word of God, and afterward convey him to his place
of safety. "(The Qur’an 9:6)
Several
other verses in the Quran which talk about fighting with the enemy (which may
not necessarily by perceived as non- Muslims only). What’s most important to
recognize is “Sanction is given unto those who fight because they have been
wronged... (The Quran 22:39-41)”
"Fight
in the cause of God those WHO FIGHT YOU, but do not transgress limits; for God
loveth not transgressors. (The Quran, 2:190)"
"But
if the enemy incline towards peace, do thou (also) incline towards peace, and
trust in God: for He is One that heareth and knoweth (all things). (The Quran,
8:61)"
"If
thou dost stretch thy hand against me, to slay me, it is not for me to stretch
my hand against thee to slay thee: for I do fear God, the cherisher of the
worlds. (The Quran, 5:28)"
"God
does not forbid you from showing kindness and dealing justly
with those
WHO HAVE NOT FOUGHT WITH YOU about religion and HAVE NOT DRIVEN YOU OUT OF YOUR
HOMES. God loves just dealers. (The Quran, 60:8)"
"And
fight them until persecution is no more, and religion is for God. But if they
desist, then let there be no hostility except against wrongdoers. (The Quran
2:193)"
"Let
there be no compulsion in religion: Truth stands out clear from error…. (The
Quran, 2:256)"
"Say,
'The truth is from your Lord': Let him who will believe, and let him who will,
reject (it):......(The Quran, 18:29)"
"If it
had been thy Lord's will, they would all have believed,- all who are on earth!
wilt thou then COMPEL mankind, against their will, to believe! (The Quran,
10:99)"
"Say :
O ye that reject Faith! I worship not that which ye worship, Nor will ye
worship that which I worship. And I will not worship that which ye have been
wont to worship, Nor will ye worship that which I worship. To you be your Way,
and to me mine. (The
Quran,
109:1-6)"
Another
view:
“Fight in
the way of Allah against those who fight against you, but begin not
hostilities. Lo! Allah loveth not aggressors. And slay them wherever ye find
them, and drive them out of the places whence they drove you out, for
persecution is worse than slaughter. And fight not with them at the Inviolable
Place of Worship until they first attack you there, but if they attack you
(there) then slay them. Such is the reward of disbelievers. “ (The Quran -
2:190-195; 2:216-218; 2:244)
“Then, when
the sacred months have passed, slay the idolaters wherever ye find them, and
take them (captive), and besiege them, and prepare for them each ambush. But if
they repent and establish worship and pay the poor-due, then leave their way
free”.... (The Quran -9:5)
“Fight
against such of those who have been given the Scripture as believe not in Allah
nor the Last Day, and forbid not that which Allah hath forbidden by His messenger,
and follow not the religion of truth, until they pay the tribute readily, being
brought low. And the Jews say: Ezra is the son of Allah, and the Christians
say: The Messiah is the son of Allah. That is their saying with their mouths.
They imitate the saying of those who disbelieved of old. Allah (Himself)
fighteth against them. How perverse are they!” (The Quran - 9:29,30)
“O Prophet!
Strive against the disbelievers and the hypocrites! Be harsh with them. Their
ultimate abode is hell, a hapless journey’s end.” (The Quran 9:73)
“O ye who
believe! Fight those of the disbelievers who are near to you, and let them find
harshness in you, and know that Allah is with those who keep their duty (unto
Him).” ( The Quran 9:123)
You can
clearly see which point of view the Jihadis are inspired by. I am no scholar to
interpret these verses in actuality. My concern is against the literal
interpretation of them. If even half of the world Muslim population took this
literally, there would be Armageddon. I urge every Muslim to reject this flawed
doctrine of violent Jihad (regardless of what the Mullahs want you to believe) and
must dissociate with all Jihadi sympathizers.
As far as
the concept of Matrydom (specifically- Jihadi suicide bombers) is concerned,
the notion itself is so absurd, I wouldn’t waste much time going over it. In
most cases you can clearly see that the bombers are brainwashed and desperately
need psychiatric help. In a recent interview of a famous Neuroscientist, it was
revealed that Religious Fundamentalism can be characterized as a mental
illness. Whatever it maybe, this bogus/deranged concept of “Holy Martyrdom”
must be discarded from the minds of every individual.
Homosexuality and adultery
Homosexuality
is a grave sin in Islam. It is considered an abomination in every Islamic
school of thought. For eg: In the Hanafi
school of thought, the homosexual is first punished through harsh beating, and
if he/she repeats the act, the death penalty is to be applied. The Quranic
rendition links the destruction of Sodom specifically to the homosexual
activities of its inhabitants (the people of Lut). In Shariah courts for the
transgression to be proven, at least four men or eight women must bear witness against
the accused, which in a way makes it difficult to persecute those who did not
remain celibate in their homes. This view of homosexuality stems from the
belief that it is a mental disorder or a sign of depraved character.
Science has
proven that homosexuality is a completely natural thing. It is found in almost
all mammals. The homosexuals don’t fake their sexual orientation to piss off
the religious folks. They are born with it. The argument conservatives make is
that it is against the natural order or it would be disastrous for human
relationships and would make everyone immoral. But that’s another debate.
Because of the latest scientific revelations, I urge fellow Muslims to rethink
on homosexuality and have a liberal approach towards this sensitive issue. We
can start by scrapping these ludicrous penalties imposed on Gays.
Adultery is
another major sin in Islam. In some cases of Sharia Law, women were stoned to
death for committing adultery. Young girls were killed by their parents to save
the family honor. Below are some verses
quoted from the Holy Quran-
“The woman
and the man guilty of unlawful sex (adultery or fornication), flog each of them
with a hundred stripes; let not compassion move you in their case in a matter
prescribed by Allah if ye believe in Allah and the Last day; and let a party of
the believers witness their punishment”. (The Quran 24:2)
“As for those of your women who are guilty of
lewdness, call to witness four of you against them. And if they testify (to the
truth of the allegation) then confine them to the houses until death take them
or (until) Allah appoint for them a way (through new legislation)” (The Quran 4:15)
“And come
not near unto adultery. Lo! it is an abomination and an evil way” (The Quran, Al-Isra’
17: 32)
Adultery is
considered a sin/reprehensible almost everywhere. But nowhere are the
adulterers flogged or stoned to death except Islamic states. Clearly this
barbaric form of punishment has no place in a civilized society. The Muslim
society must explore a non violent and yet fair alternative to this. For eg:
The culprit can be deprived financially or custody of the children etc…
Slavery, concept of blood money and Kafir/Kufr/Infidels
In the
civilized world, Slavery has been abolished. But some sections of Muslim
society still believe in it. Sharia Law and its advocates like Zakir Naik claim
it is lawful for male masters to have sexual relations with female captives and
slaves. Slaves were offered as part of the booty and made captives during the wars in Pre Islamic Arabia. Prophet
Mohammed ordered Muslims to treat slaves with kindness and make efforts grant
freedom to as many as possible.
Surah
At-Tawbah (9:60) from The Quran specifies that Zakat is to be used for freeing
slaves and bonded labourers. Muslims must regard slavery as an evil and show
zero tolerance towards anyone who tries to legitimize it.
The Islamic
states also have a concept of “Diyya”-
Financial
compensation paid to the heirs of a victim. In Arabic, the word means both
blood money and ransom. The reason I chose to bring up this issue is because
some devilish/evil/rotten decisions have been passed off by the Sharia courts
as Islamic judgments. Recently, a cleric raped his 5 year old daughter and
killed her. He was let off by the Sharia Court and agreed to pay the blood
money. This is worse than some of the racial laws legislated by the Nazis.
Clearly we need a overhaul in this aspect.
There has
been a lot of debate on certain terms like Kafir and Kufr nowadays. The
Islamists use these words to addresses all non Muslims. Let’s see it from an
Islamic perspective: Kafir is the one
who after knowing Islam rejects it. Whereas a non Muslim could be anyone who
has neither studied Islam nor has made a conscious decision of rejecting it as
is also evident from the following verses:
"Those
who disbelieve among the people of the book and among the polytheists…” (The Quran, 98:6).
“And
whoever invokes (or worships), besides Allah, any other ilah (god), of whom he
has no proof; then his reckoning is only with his Lord. Surely! Al-Kafirun (the
disbelievers in Allah and in the Oneness of Allah, polytheists, pagans,
idolaters) will not be successful.” (The
Quran, 23:117)
Kufr is an
act and not just a label for all non-Muslims. It is they who should neither be
taken as protectors nor as friends, but still must be treated justly and with
politeness. Prophet Mohammed used to keep good relations with non-Muslims, keep
their trusts, eat their food and visit them when they were sick.
What is
forbidden for Muslims is the relationship of wilayah with Kafirs (who knowingly
reject Islam). Hence we see this hostility towards people like Ayaan Hirsi Ali,
Salman Rushdie etc… Even relatively moderate Muslims despise them for various
reasons. In Islamic states, Kafirs would be rewarded the death penalty.
Nowadays, the Islamists have started attacking even the non-Muslims who
criticize Islam. From writers who wanted to translate/publish the Satanic Verses to
Dutch Film maker Van Gogh were killed brutally by these terrorists. The most
disturbing fact we've found from all aspects discussed above is the harshness/severity
of the penalties involved. These are medieval and inhuman in nature and they
cannot be relevant in the modern world. This is precisely what I want my fellow
Muslims to realize and condemn in the most effective way possible.
Reformation
Reformation
in Islam has been discussed and debated for centuries. In the modern times, advocates
of international human rights standards such as Abdolkarim Soroush, Asghar Ali
Engineer and Khaled Abou El-Fadl – attempted to develop Islamic support for
human rights through a critical examination of Sharia and calls for ijtihad
(independent juridical reasoning) and reinterpretation of the Quran and Sunna
of the Prophet (Hadith).The conflict with the interpretation comes in cases
like - you can find verses of the Quran that support modern
human rights principles like freedom of religion and equality for women. But one
can equally quote verses that seem to support the opposing view.
This is the
real issue we face. It makes it crucial to establish a consistent framework of
interpretation and not simply the availability of texts of Quran that can be
understood one way or another. How do we begin? First, Muslims and other
believers should be able to propose policy and legislative initiatives
emanating from their religious beliefs, provided they can support them in free
and open debate by giving reasons that are accessible, transparent and
convincing to the generality of citizens, regardless of their religion or other
beliefs. If it’s a Muslim majority nation, the state action must conform to
basic democratic, constitutional and human rights safeguards to protect all
it’s citizens against the tyranny of the majority.
The reason
why counties like Saudi Arabia and Iran are flawed theocracies is because they
fail to realize that Sharia can only be freely observed by believers, and its
principles lose their religious authority and value when enforced by the state.
Religion requires free reflection and choice by believers among equally
accessible competing interpretations and religious authorities, independently
from coercive authority of the state. It’s absurd to present state law as a divine
command. For instance- The Quran has three different levels of understanding:
the literal/metaphorical, the metaphysical, and then a level which almost no human
can grasp/perceive. People who issue insubstantial Fatwas or nonsensical diktats
in God’s name should realize this and be severely reprimanded for playing God.
The forward march
Any adherence
to the explicit or literal sense of a given doctrine is unacceptable.
Unfortunately today, a large section of Muslims are in a state of cognitive
dissonance. This is an unnerving sign because it makes them unpredictable. They
must realize that everyone is gifted with the ability to reason. It is within
our capacity to consciously make sense of things, apply logic, establish/verify
facts, change /justify practices, institutions, and beliefs based on new or
existing information. Here again, one comes in conflict with discursive and
intuitive reasoning. A simple way of avoiding such a case is to estimate the
causality of one’s action through a relativistic approach (with respect to
another individual. The action-consequence principle). One of the ways of
reasoning is the Scientific method. The
steps to follow it are:
o Ask a Question
o Do Background Research
o Construct a Hypothesis
o Test Your Hypothesis by Doing an Experiment
o Analyze Your Data and Draw a Conclusion
o Communicate Your Results
This still doesn't attend to a man’s thirst for spiritual guidance. The answers to
questions which are beyond Human cognition. The origin of consciousness,
meaning of life, concept of soul, the presence of a conscience (Good vs Evil,
Right vs Wrong ) etc…The questions vary for each individual, hence making
religion something which is very personal, between you and your creator. One
simply should not impose his views on others as it violates the inalienable
right to individuality. I believe Prophet Mohammed and the scientists who
immortalized the Golden age of Islam understood this. One must only stop asking
himself questions after he dies. It is only through doubt Mankind has
progressed and will continue to do so. I urge all Muslims to take up the tools
of science and build on the framework of their doubts inorder to make your life
meaningful and satisfy your conscience by helping your fellow human beings.
“That man
can have nothing but what he strives for; That the fruit of his striving will
soon come in sight: Then will he be rewarded with a reward complete.”
(The Quran
53:39-41)
“Caliph Umar
(RA) one day came into the mosque of the Prophet Mohammed (PBUH) and found two
young people. He asked them:
“What do you do?” They said “We only worship Allah Almighty.” Umar said to them “No, no, where do you work?” They said, “We don’t work. We are righteous people who just make Zikr (remembrance) of Allah. We are, alhamdullilah, from those people whom Allah chose to be close to Him.”
Then Umar said to them “Wait one minute,” and came back with a stick and began hitting them, and said, “Go work somewhere. Go find a job”. source
“What do you do?” They said “We only worship Allah Almighty.” Umar said to them “No, no, where do you work?” They said, “We don’t work. We are righteous people who just make Zikr (remembrance) of Allah. We are, alhamdullilah, from those people whom Allah chose to be close to Him.”
Then Umar said to them “Wait one minute,” and came back with a stick and began hitting them, and said, “Go work somewhere. Go find a job”. source